9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to the offender plus the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The an abundance of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair towards the offender plus the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The loads of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is actually made crystal clear that police is free to acquire action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities issue to regulation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. Should the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-industry duties within the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may perhaps find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement with the laws, the legal system adheres towards the doctrine of stare decisis
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in help from the Supreme Court, ensuring the enforcement of its judgments. As the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, the decision in the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. Read more
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents from the boy or Female don't approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they here will do if they are able to Slice off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to endeavor by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
Some bodies are offered statutory powers to issue guidance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is properly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. In the event the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then approach the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the ninety times to the department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we are guided from the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
Any court could seek to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to reach a different summary. The validity of such a distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have listened to the uncovered counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession in the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this element for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage just isn't in depth, but this is an excellent starting point. See Background section at bottom of RECAP website for more information.